Kevin Pietersen’s international
career was ended so captain Alastair Cook could create a culture where players
'trust each other', the ECB has said.
The governing body has been criticised for failing
to explain why Pietersen, 33, was released early from his central contract
after England’s 5-0 Ashes whitewash by Australia.
But on Sunday, the ECB said it wants to “create a
culture” in which Test and one-day captain Alastair Cook had “the full support
of all players”.
This non-explanation is just a re-hash of the
pitiful crap the ECB has been trying to feed everyone ever since they decided
to get rid of Pietersen.
So according to this statement the reason Pietersen
was removed was because he didn’t fully trust a captain who presided over one
of the most disastrous tours in the history of the England cricket team.
For daring to question a captain and selectors whose
record in all formats in Australia reads played 13, won 1 and lost 12, Pietersen
should go, really?
I’m inclined to believe the real reason is the ECB
and Cook didn’t like their authority being questioned and wanted total control
and an easier life for themselves, so they all decided to get rid of the one
person in the team brave enough to question their poor decision making.
Otherwise
why would they so steadfastly refuse to answer the question of why they decided
to drop one of England’s greatest ever players when he could still play for at
least another three years, and why aren't other big name players being forced out the side in a similar fashion?
No comments:
Post a Comment